Tuesday, 28 April 2026

1899 ½d green - Split fraction variety

This page is a census of the 1899 ½d green stamp (the so-called Widows Weeds) 'split-fraction' variety. It is the most prominent constant variety for this issue and is described by Scudder as "Near vertical white flaw on the "2" and the fraction line." It appears to have commenced as a scratch below the fraction line and then extended slightly further and got slightly larger over time. It was fully formed while still on the original plate 1.

This variety is not present on early sheets. Scudder states this variety is known from 1900 onwards. The earliest example I have seen is from 1901.

On the original plate, known as plate one, it occurs in position no 107 with the Cowan Crown over Q watermarked paper. In 1906 this plate was refurbished and rearranged whereby the centre and lower electros were interchanged. Called plate 1a, this variety then became position 67

Examples seen on the Cowan Crown over Q watermarked paper can be from either plate. However, all examples seen on the Cowan Crown over A watermarked paper are from plate 1a (position 67)

This variety is not listed in either the Stanley Gibbons or Brusden White catalogues.

The split fraction variety when it first formed

The split fraction variety in its fullest extent

Positions 67 and 107 without the variety
This block of 30 from the Butler collection shows both positions (67 and 107) without the variety, thus indicating that it was NOT present originally but developed later

Another 
block of 30 in the collection of Dr Andrew Mortlock also showing both positions (67 and 107) without the variety

block of 42 courtesy of Dave Elsmore also showing both positions (67 and 107) without the variety

Mint examples
Plate 1
Position 107. Seen in the collection of Dr Andrew Mortlock

Watermark Crown over Q, so probably plate 1. From my collection

Plate 1a

A full sheet with the flaw shown in position 67. Click on the image to enlarge. Seen in Status Stamps auctions in 2015


Another full sheet with the flaw shown in position 67. Click on the image to enlarge. Seen on Ebay in 2020


Position 67; from a block of 24 in the collection of Dave Elsmore

Used
Plate 1
1901
Plate 1 (position 67) dated 1901. Seen in my collection

Plate 1
Unknown year
Position 107 (plate 1) date stamped Brisbane. Seen in the collection of Dr Andrew Mortlock

Position 107 (plate 1) date stamped Bundaberg, from my collection

Position 107 (plate 1). With a Sydney machine cancel. Seen in the collection of Henk Godthelp

Two examples of position 107 (plate 1) from my collection

Position 107 (plate 1). Seen in the collection of Henk Godthelp

Plate 1a
1908
Plate 1a (position 67) dated 1908. Seen in the collection of Tony Griffin

Plate 1a (position 67) dated 15 December 1908. Seen in the collection of Henk Godthelp

1911
Plate 1a (position 67), an OS example dated Goondiwindi 19 April 1911. Seen in the collection of Henk Godthelp

Unknown year
An undated example seen in the Queensland Stamp Collecting Facebook Group

Four examples from my collection

An undated used example courtesy of Dave Elsmore

An example from Position 107 (plate 1) and position 67 (plate 1a). Seen in the collection of Dr Andrew Mortlock

Monday, 27 April 2026

1895 ½d green blob - a transient flaw (SG 223)

This page shows examples of a spectacular transient flaw where an irregular shaped piece of paper has adhered to the plate. The adhesion is in the same colour ink as this issue, albeit more concentrated, suggesting it has come into contact with the ink used to print the sheets of stamps. 

The flaw has been seen in two different positions, indicating that it shifted on the plate before either being noticed and removed or naturally being loosened off the plate. It is not known which of the two positions (assuming it is in fact the same paper adhesion) came first

Flaw at bottom left
A lovely example on a pair. Seen in the Queensland Stamp Collecting Facebook Group

An example on a single stamp. Seen in the Queensland Stamp Collecting Facebook Group

Flaw at top centre
Here the flaw is at the top of the stamp. From my collection